I think you are being fooled by differences in the scale of the images
(the film image is larger and framed more tightly), the change in
lighting, and the contrast of the images(the dark glass in the
background buildings is black in the film shot). All those
inconsistencies in taking the comparison pictures contribute to the
relative flatness of the digital image. Reichmann was primarily
talking about resolution of details in a modestly sized print. To use
his test for something else is probably a mistake.
Winsor
Long Beach, CA
USA
On Oct 4, 2006, at 8:33 AM, Manuel Viet wrote:
>
> I disagree ; when I look at both pictures, clearly the digital one
> looks to me
> flatter than the film one.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|