Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: While Oly twiddles their incrtutable thumbs.. [ was Not much to

Subject: [OM] Re: While Oly twiddles their incrtutable thumbs.. [ was Not much to be proud of. The mock-up revealed...]
From: ScottGee1 <scottgee1@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 16:28:52 -0400
To give ol' Phil the benefit of the doubt, I have to agree with him.

If the manufacturers are gonna call it "White Balance", white should
be white.  If not, call it "Warm Balance" or some such.

ScottGee1

On 9/26/06, Moose <olymoose@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Chuck Norcutt wrote:
> > So many cameras do poorly on incandescent white balance whether auto or
> > the incandescent setting that I don't believe it's an "error".  I think
> > it's delibate and mimicking what people have come to expect in having
> > their daylight film night shots exposed indoors partly by flash and
> > partly by incandescent lights.
> I'm sure you are right. I've never personally had a problem, as I shoot
> RAW and can choose a different WB setting if I want it.
>
> I didn't think it through, just noticed that Phil's usual rant against
> Canyon AWB had now been extended to N.
>
> Moose

==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz