Exquisite!
Chuck Norcutt
Paul wrote:
> I like the 50mm f/3.5 macro on the E-1 - works very well. The official
> OM adapter is also of very good quality.
>
> Som examples:
>
> OM 50mm f/3.5
>
> http://www.photocamel.com/index.php/topic,6323.0.html
> http://www.photocamel.com/index.php/topic,1242.0.html
>
>
> To be honest (and I hope this isn't too much of a diversion), I've found
> the OM lenses also work really well on the Canon 5D, e.g.
>
> 24mm f/2.8
> http://www.photocamel.com/index.php/topic,9278.0.html
>
> 50mm f/3.5 + Tamron 90mm f/2.5 (OM mount)
> http://www.photocamel.com/index.php/topic,8453.0.html
>
>
>
>
> Jim Couch wrote:
>
>>As I contemplate a possible move to digital I am pondering what of my OM
>>stuff to keep. (Much would need to be sold to finance the move.) I am
>>wondering which OM lenses folks are using on their E series bodies and
>>for what purpose/use. As I contemplate my current stable I don't much
>>point to keeping any of my OM lenses other than maybe my macros. With
>>the magnification factor the WA lenses would seem to not have much use,
>>and on the longer lenses I think I would want the auto focus capability.
>>(As I age my eyes just don't seem to be what they used to be!) I am
>>curious what OM lenses those of you who have an E series body are
>>finding useful.
>>
>>Jim Couch
>>
>>
>>
>>==============================================
>>List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
>>List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
>>==============================================
>>
>
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|