Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: Are blurred pictures any good?

Subject: [OM] Re: Are blurred pictures any good?
From: Chris Barker <ftog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 21:35:49 +0100
Well it works for me.  If the mother had been in focus as well it  
would have been a little difficult to look at, given that the baby's  
head partly obscures the mother's.

Chris
On 3 Sep 2006, at 19:05, Chuck Norcutt wrote:

> Well, I thought I was pushing the boundaries a little with this one.
> Baby in focus, the mom deliberately a little out of focus thus placing
> emphasis on the baby in the foreground.  I was happy with it but I  
> guess
> I pushed the boundaries a little too far.  The mom (the only one who
> counts here) wasn't happy with it.  But I'll keep trying.  :-)
> <http://www.chucknorcutt.com/temp/IMG_1099%20r.jpg>
>
> Chuck Norcutt
>
>
> NSURIT@xxxxxxx wrote:
>
>>
>> Focus ain't all it is cracked up to be.  If all the images you   
>> have hanging
>> on your walls or that are in your portfolio are tack sharp, IMHO   
>> you have not
>> pushed the boundaries very far.  But then you might  expect a  
>> pinhead to say
>> something like that.  <[8^) Bill  Barber
>
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz