The appearance to me was that 200 ISO on the 5D was being compared to
800 ISO on the 300D. The was amplified by seeing the noise in the 300D
image. Am I wrong?
Chuck Norcutt
Moose wrote:
> Chuck Norcutt wrote:
>
>>I remember seeing and being amazed by these tests before. But I never
>>paid attention to the ISO and exposure comments which I find confusing.
>> Can you explain?
>>
>
> I can't explain the shutter speeds of the test samples at the moment.
> It's been too long and it's too late here, or early, whatever to go
> checking if I got it right. I don't think it matters for the purposes of
> the test. I should probably just delete those references.
>
> The isos simply mean I tested at 200 iso and at 800. The 5D was very new
> to me at the time and I was simply curious how the different noise
> levels at different isos would affect the apparent sharpness. Mostly it
> just showed how much quieter the 5D is, but also that noise does indeed
> seem to affect sharpness some.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|