> I have today installed Picture Window Pro 4.0, and, yes, it's
> RAW conversion results in a dreadfully flat image. I am
> seriously disappointed, as PWP has long been one of my
> favorites. Extending the dynamic range sliders 25% in either
> direction seem to pretty much correct the problem, but that
> shouldn't be necessary. Still, I like a lot of the other
> things PWP does, so I'll keep using it.
It appears to be a gamma problem more than a contrast problem.
I'll need to experiment more, but it looks as though the gamma
is off by a magnitude or two. However, it has nearly the same
look as the converter in Vuescan. Could it be that they both
use the DCRAW algorithms?
AG
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|