<snip> from Paul (re: E1/E-330):
"I've found the high ISO noise to be fairly easily dealt with via post
processing,..."
I suspect in years past we would have seen canonites saying much the same,
vis a vis, dust on the sensor, or
"I've found [dust on the sensor] to be fairly easily dealt with via post
processing,..." Now it's such a given that
images will have to be "dusted" it's taken for granted -- or at least my
N*k*n-shooting tells me.
>
> Chuck,
> Clearly Canaanites are in denial about dust, and E-thingers about noise.
;^)
>
> Joel W.
>
> On 4/8/06, Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > We'll have to watch this, Moose. This is the second known instance of a
> > 5D sensor getting dirty in a very short period of time. This caused
> > me to run off and check the camera forums for "5D dust". Much to my
> > surprise the only things I found were many complaints about dust in the
> > viewfinder/penatprism area... not the sensor. Oh, well.
> >
> > Chuck Norcutt
> >
> > Paul wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > I had use of a Canon 5D for a week or so recently and it has extremely
> > > low noise even up to ISO 1600. However, it is in no way near the E-1
in
> > > build quality, had poor AWB, consistently blew highlights, had very
poor
> > > quality in the corners of the image (admittedly,the lenses I had
weren't
> > > 'L' quality - but they didn't show this limitation on film), and
within
> > > a week I had enough spots on the sensor that I had to order a cleaning
kit.
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|