We've been having in-house, local wireless network problems, and I'm afraid I
overlooked this from yesterday, having been kicked off a half dozen times.
I'm not sure what you're asking. The white spots are on the flower.
Sharpening was minimal. The EXIF actually shows -1 for sharpening, and I
simply downsized the RAW to a web-size JPEG. I may have done some minimal
fiddling with the shot, but I certainly don't think I over-sharpened it. And
if sharpening causes white dots, why would they be only in the blue of the
flower and not in the green of the leaves? I even went back and took a really
close look at the vinca blooms, and, sure enough, the flowers have little white
specks on 'em. I could post a photograph of one so you could -- oh, that's
right. I did already. :-)
If I'm missing something, I'm willing to be informed.
Walt
--
"Anything more than 500 yards from
the car just isn't photogenic." --
Edward Weston
-------------- Original message ----------------------
From: Wayne S <om4t@xxxxxxxx>
> At 03:38 PM 3/14/2006, you wrote:
>
> >http://home.att.net/~hiwayman/wsb/media/192375/site1096.jpg
> >
> >Walt
>
> How much sharpening was done? I ask because my experience
> with even minimal sharpening are the white spots in the flower.
> Get back out there and give us the raw experience. If I were to go
> outside, all I would see is mud and dry dead stuff from last year.
> Is this flower a product of global warming by any chance?
>
> Wayne
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|
