| Subject: | [OM] Digital vs film resolution |
|---|---|
| From: | Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 08 Mar 2006 08:21:23 -0500 |
I never have understood why low resolution digital looks so good compared to film until I found this. Now it all makes sense. <http://www.luminous-landscape.com/essays/clumps.shtml> Chuck Norcutt ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: Digital decisions, Chuck Norcutt |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [OM] Re: OM-1 battery test, Russ Butler |
| Previous by Thread: | [OM] (OM) 35-105, Brian Swale |
| Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: Digital vs film resolution, Robert Swier |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |