Hasn't John Foster tried them all? IIRC he got better results with
the slower lenses in general.
http://biofos.com/cornucop/omz_e1.html
--Joao
At 1:51 PM -0500 08.02.06, ScottGee1 wrote:
>I suspect them old OM lenses'll do just fine on Oly double-digit MP
>cameras -- *when* they arrive. After all, aren't the Canonites paying
>Big Bucks for the wide-angles so they can use 'em on their full frame
>high MP bodies?
>
>BTW, has anyone tried an OM 50/1.2 on an E-mount body?
>
>ScottGee1
>
>
>On 2/7/06, Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>SNIP!
>
>> To be fair, ZD lenses are newer and undoubtedly better. They also
>> communicate with the body so that lens specific parameters can be
>> handled. They're probably made to resolve 10-12 MP on the 4/3 sensor.
>> But the OM lesnes compare very well when they only have to handle 5 MP
>> on the E-1. Maybe 8 MP on the later cameras as well.
>>
>> Chuck Norcutt
>==============================================
>List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
>List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
>==============================================
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|