I don't see it either. I've had one of these lenses for several years, use it
fairly often, and have never observed such a problem. Of course, I've never
noticed the chromatic aberration that allegedly plagues the 180/2.8 Zuiko
either, so maybe I don't know what to look for. Perhaps ignorance really is
bliss.
Walt
--
"Anything more than 500 yards from
the car just isn't photogenic." --
Edward Weston
-------------- Original message ----------------------
From: ScottGee1 <scottgee1@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Whew! Glad to hear I'm not the only one . . . maybe I'm more aberrant
> than the CA and thus cannot perceive it. ;o)
>
> ScottGee1
>
>
> On 1/9/06, Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Sorry, I can't see it either.
> >
> > Chuck Norcutt
> >
> > Donald MacDonald wrote:
> >
> > >>On 1/9/06, Michael Wong <mialop.wong@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>Dear all,
> > >>I have gotten a Tamron SP 17mm F3.5 & found its' chromatic aberration is
> > >>serious.
> > >>http://palmboy.palmcyber.net/gallery/albums/album125/IMG877.jpg
> > >>
> > >>Is there any comment for this lens?
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>Thank you very much^^
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>Michael
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > Geez, I'm not seeing this at all. Do I need new glasses? What's not to
> > > like?
> > >
> > > This lens is well known as a 'keeper', and is on the cult lens list. I'd
> > > certainly buy one, on this evidence.
> > >
> > > D.
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|
