| Subject: | [OM] Re: ZD 50/2 |
|---|---|
| From: | <oly-zooko@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 27 Dec 2005 14:47:28 -0500 (EST) |
Certainly the 50/2 is a nice lens...I can see that. Now my dilemma.. is the 14-54 F2.8 really that much better than the 14-45 F3.5? I have an opportunity to purchase either the 50/2 or the 14-54/2.8 right now. - Ali ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [OM] Konica AR to four-thirds, oly-zooko |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [OM] Re: ZD 50/2 was Re: Spiratone Fisheye 12mm, Brian Swale |
| Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: ZD 50/2 was Re: Spiratone Fisheye 12mm, savvo |
| Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: ZD 50/2 was Re: Spiratone Fisheye 12mm, Brian Swale |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |