Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: E300 vs E1

Subject: [OM] Re: E300 vs E1
From: "R. Jackson" <jackson.robert.r@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2005 23:39:16 -0700

On Aug 10, 2005, at 11:18 PM, Winsor Crosby wrote:

>  Nikon looks cool. Lower priced cameras like the E-300,
> 300D or D50 tend to a more brightly colored crisper image more
> pleasing to an amateur who is moving up than the more professional
> models which tend to be set up more to prevent highlight blowout and
> need more work in the software after downloading.
>
> Winsor

Ah, it's like the never-ending debates about cinematography lenses.  
Zeiss is cold, Cooke is warm, Angenieux is, er, French. Lomo is, uh,  
what I could afford. ;-)

Which brings up another thing, at what point did the U.S. stop trying  
to build photographic optics? It seems to pretty much be an Asia v.  
Europe game now. At least we still break new ground in unaffordable  
high-end audio components. ;-)

-Rob


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz