Pan F Plus? Frozen stocks of APX 25?
Earl
Walt Wayman wrote:
>Add another devilish voice to the din. With nine cases of gear already,
>what's one more itsy-bitsy OM body? And I've been shooting Tri-X since Moby
>Dick was a minnow. The only B&W film I think is better is Plus-X, and only by
>a little bit.
>
>Walt
>
>--
>"Anything more than 500 yards from
>the car just isn't photogenic." --
>Edward Weston
>
> -------------- Original message ----------------------
>From: "R. Jackson" <jackson.robert.r@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
>>On Jul 12, 2005, at 3:54 PM, Earl Dunbar wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>I really don't think you can beat Tri-X, but then I haven't played
>>>much
>>>with HP5 Plus, APX 400 or Neopan. I've seen some shots on
>>>rangefinderforum.com of Tri-X pushed to ridiculous ISOs that really
>>>impressed me, so it's flexible.
>>>
>>>
>>I've always enjoyed shooting Tri-X. My first newspaper job was at a
>>place where they used to bulk load HP5 for me all the time and when
>>I'd occasionally shoot some of my own Tri-X I'd get comments on how
>>good my shots looked that week. I just get nervous about always
>>reaching for the old standby these days. I'm always sure someone will
>>tell me about some new wonderfilm I'm an idiot for not using. ;-)
>>
>>
>>
>>>That said... WHAT'S ONE MORE BODY? Take the OM-2n too ... it's small!
>>>
>>>
>>You're the voice of the Devil. ;-)
>>
>>
>>
>==============================================
>List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
>List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
>==============================================
>
>
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|