Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: Comparison of E-1 print and OM film print.

Subject: [OM] Re: Comparison of E-1 print and OM film print.
From: Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 08:11:40 -0400
Why do you relate this tale as a comparison of the E-1/digital vs. the 
OM-4/film instead of a comparison of the ZD 14-45 and the Zuiko 35-105? 
  And especially not of the same scenes and not on a tripod.

As you say:  "I must try more equal comparisons some time soon."

Chuck Norcutt



Brian Swale wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> Today I had two 8 x 12 prints made of panorama shots (unfortunately 
> different scenes).
> One was from the E-1, sharpened twice with Unsharp Mask.
> E-1 + ZD 14-45 f/3.5-5.6,  asa 100. Aperture and focal length uncertain at 
> present..
> Camera held in hand firmly against building wall (or on a steel railing).
> 
> Second was from the OM4T, Zuiko 35-105 f/3.5-4.5 at f/8 and 105mm, Fuji 
> Superia Reala asa 100 print film. Camera used in the portrait position, held 
> down on top of a wooden post set firmly in the ground. Image from a negative 
> scan was sharpened once with Unsharp mask.
> 
> The print from the OM4T / Fuji Reala asa 100, is clearly more sharp; the 
> detail it holds is just great. The E-1 shot shows the smudging of detail 
> typical of digital shots being asked to do too much.
> 
> I must try more equal comparisons some time soon.



==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz