Yeah well, I still like 40-42mm. And I like the ones on my SPs just
fine, so THERE!
I suspect if I ever go the full RF route, it will be 28mm, 40mm, 90mm.
Earl
Moose wrote:
>Earl Dunbar wrote:
>
>
>
>>If I could afford the Zuiko OM pancake, I'd have at least one. If Maitani
>>were still at the helm, I'd be emailing him every day for a 40/f1.2. I'm
>>sure no one else at Olympus today would listen.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>One of the reasons for the 40/2 pancake lenses, by at least Oly and
>Nik*n, is that 40mm is the shortest fl that can be made in a "normal"
>symetrical formula and still not interfere with the SLR mirror. That
>made it a natural for the most compact possible lens. Since the only
>real advantage of the 40mm over a 50mm, from a marketing perspective
>(and as has been pointed out, the 40/2 was a marketplace failure), was
>it's size, it made no sense to design a big, fast one.
>
>The real question was why they didn't design really fast 35mm and/or
>80-100mm lenses. A 35/1.2 or 85/1.4 makes more sense in the market than
>a 40/1.2. Yes, I know about the CV 40/1.2. See my rant about Agfa and
>Kodak for why this is a whole different kettle of developer than Oly in
>the OM heyday.
>
>Moose
>
>
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|