Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: OM size vs small RFs, was Relative costs ...

Subject: [OM] Re: OM size vs small RFs, was Relative costs ...
From: Rick Beckrich <rick_beckrich@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 05:28:47 -0700 (PDT)

Chris Barker <ftog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
 ....I got to thinking: with a 35 or 50 attached, the OM bodes 
are as small as the rangefinders. I write this because I keep lusting 
after a 35mm rangefinder.... 
 
Actually, I started with OMs because they felt so much like the L**** IIIf
I had been using for years. Recently I've backslid into the RF trap again.
First with old Russian stuff, than added two CV Bessa (L & R).   Rick 

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com 

==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz