[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] OM size vs small RFs, was Relative costs ...

Subject: [OM] OM size vs small RFs, was Relative costs ...
From: Chris Barker <ftog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 16:32:40 +0100
Aargh, it get's worse!

Actually, I took my 2SP out for a walk a couple of weeks ago with FP4 
loaded and I got to thinking: with a 35 or 50 attached, the OM bodes 
are as small as the rangefinders.  I write this because I keep lusting 
after a 35mm rangefinder, but when I looked down at the OM2SP in my 
hand, complete with the 3rd party grip that Skip Williams pointed me 
towards around 18 months ago, I wondered at how small it was.

So, I shall stick with my OMs and changeable and wonderful lenses.


~~ >-)-
C M I Barker
Cambridgeshire, Great Britain.
+44 (0)7092 251126

On 26 Apr 2005, at 15:49, AG Schnozz wrote:

>> Good news Chris!  You must have Beta things to do :-)
> Like shooting some Delta.

List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz