Gentlemen, gentlemen . . . thanks for the welcome and advice.
About a week ago I posted a question at Rangefinder Forum asking which
SLR is most like an RF. Oly came up a lot and after reading about its
history I can see why. But reading can go only so far and then one
has to jump into the pool to have the experience.
I sent a note to NSURIT with an offer to help him lighten the load of
gear he's planning to haul to the camera show.
Even though I live in a 'major metropolitan area' it's almost
impossible to find a good selection of used gear so I can't handle
these items before committing to buying them - frustrating! The
Digital Revolution is really taking a toll on camera dealers and
independent film labs.
BTW, my understanding is that the OM-4T and Ti are identical - is that correct?
Thanks!/ScottGee1
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 20:02:32 -0800, Mike <watershed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Ag, I'm disappointed. Go give yourself a dope slap. When it comes to lens
> sequences one should own anyone on this list knows it should read something
> like this: 8, 16, 18, 20macro, 21/3.5, 21/2, 24/2.8, 24/2, 24 shift, 28/3.5,
> 28/2.8, 28/2, 35/2, 35, 35 shift, 38macro, 40, 50, ...... you get the idea
> ;>)
>
> mike
>
>
> ==============================================
> List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
> List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
> ==============================================
>
==============================================
List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================
|