| Subject: | [OM] Re: Evolt review |
|---|---|
| From: | "Wayne Harridge" <wayneharridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 13 Jan 2005 19:18:58 +1100 |
> > Seems to me that Olympus haven't sorted the issue of noise out on > their sensor at higher ISOs. The noise on the DPreview images > at higher > ISO looked horrendous (to me anyway!). I still think the chips need > cooling (please don't flame me for saying this :) !). > I can also see the potential problems with the mirror layout and > misalignment, however I think it will be a lot sturdier than > it seems. > I've have several porro-prism binoculars, which I would say were much > sturdier than most digital cameras I've seen and handled, where the > prisms have become misaligned with a slight impact. I bet > Olympus have > built in some simple collimation techniques so the mirrors can be > collimated easily. Then again... I do like the look of the > camera though. > I'd say that if you bump your Evolt hard enough to effect the alignment of the mirrors you might as well through it away. I doubt that Olympus (or anyone else) would consider it worth fixing. ...Wayne ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: Trolls[OT], Jan Steinman |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [OM] Re: Fungus, Rob Smith |
| Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: Evolt review, Gareth.J.Martin |
| Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: Evolt review, Gareth.J.Martin |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |