Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: kodachrome vs fuji

Subject: [OM] Re: kodachrome vs fuji
From: BllPear@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 18:59:03 -0500
Are you already a regular user of Kodachrome? If not, it is probably not a good 
idea to spend the time and money to learn to use it, as there are apparently 
only two labs worldwide that can process it, and Kodak is a bit coy about its 
future. Of course, if it is an old friend, use it like mad, as it is certainly 
in the hospice.

Fuji makes some quite good chromes. Just about anything commercial still shot 
on chrome is on Provia, except fashion, which favors Astia. Provia is generally 
considered neutral (that is to say more probably think it is neutral as do 
Kodachrome) in color, and acceptable in saturation and contrast. Astia is of 
lower saturation and contrast, and works very well for skin tones.

Kodak has made some real improvments in Ektachrome, in the G films, but the 
cost is much higher, so I just stick with fuji.

Bill Pearce

__________________________________________________________________
Switch to Netscape Internet Service.
As low as $9.95 a month -- Sign up today at http://isp.netscape.com/register

Netscape. Just the Net You Need.

New! Netscape Toolbar for Internet Explorer
Search from anywhere on the Web and block those annoying pop-ups.
Download now at http://channels.netscape.com/ns/search/install.jsp

==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [OM] Re: kodachrome vs fuji, BllPear <=
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz