Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: Ah, Bokeh! Or is it Hokey?

Subject: [OM] Re: Ah, Bokeh! Or is it Hokey?
From: "Dean Tyler" <dtyler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 15:53:47 -0400
I didn't notice any real difference.  The second shot may have a little more
contrast and DOF.  Personally, the only shots I have taken that have great
bokeh are ones that were taken because I saw interesting bokeh in the
viewfinder regardless of the lens.  If fact, what I consider my best bokeh
photograph were taken with a Tokina 80-200 f4.5 RMC, not the most highly
regarded lens.

Dean

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Barker [mailto:ftog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2004 2:08 PM
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [OM] Re: Ah, Bokeh! Or is it Hokey?



No

I couldn't say that one was better than the other.

Chris
On 26 Aug 2004, at 17:12, Walt Wayman wrote:

> Last summer I did a short series (about half a roll of Provia 100F) of
> test shots to compare the 90/2 Zuiko and the 90/2.8 Tamron macros.  I
> couldn't tell any real difference.  Now, since the bokeh subject has
> reared its fuzzy head again, and because the 90/2 Zuiko is said by
> many to have the most wonderful bokeh, I'm putting up a couple of
> shots, one taken with each lens.  About the only things these lenses
> have in common is that they both have nine-blade diaphragms.
>
> These are straight scans, with no sharpening or other adjustments
> whatsoever, of a deliberatly chosen "difficult" subject in fairly
> harsh lighting.  For some reason, although scanned at 2700 d.p.i.
> before being JPGed down to 800 pixels wide, they look kinda "soft."  I
> promise, though, that they are equally sharp and have oodles of
> detail.  But anyway, I'm doing this only for the bokeh, so "soft"
> don't much matter.
>
> If anybody can see any difference, I hope they'll 'splain it to me.  I
> guess I'm just not all that sensitive, because bokeh has never been
> that important to me.  Unless it's really bad and/or the subject is
> really boring, I usually don't even notice it.
>
> http://home.att.net/~hiwayman/wsb/html/view.cgi-photo.html--SiteID
> -724214.html
> http://home.att.net/~hiwayman/wsb/html/view.cgi-photo.html--SiteID
> -724215.html
>
> Walt, the bokeh clod
>
>
<|_:-)_|>

C M I Barker
Cambridgeshire, Great Britain.

+44 (0)7092 251126
ftog at threeshoes.co.uk
http://www.threeshoes.co.uk
http://homepage.mac.com/zuiko
... a nascent photo library.


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================





==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz