Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: Grain with APX100 in Rodinal?

Subject: [OM] Re: Grain with APX100 in Rodinal?
From: Chris Barker <ftog@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2004 07:54:18 +0100
I will give it a go with less agitation Earl.  Nothing I have 
photographed is too good for the experimentation – to some degree at 
least... ;-)

I have, of course, saved the page, for all my criticism of his writing 
style ...

Chris

On 4 Aug 2004, at 2:37, Earl Dunbar wrote:

>
> As I understand it, in my "senior-moment/curmugdeonly" brain, the 
> higher dilution results in a more "gentle" action that has advantages 
> for acutance, less grain clumping, etc.  There IS a balance between 
> this and wet time... nothing is free. Fine grain developers such as 
> Microphen and Microdol achieved their affect by silver solvent action. 
>   Fine grain, yes, but reduced acutance and perhaps reduced tonal 
> separation.  The tradeoff was acceptable and reasonable to some, but 
> not to me. A chaque son gout.
>
> In addition, Mironchuk talks about higher activity resulting in 
> greater contrast in the highlights.  I suppose this is the same as 
> reduced tonal separation.  In any event, I have always been fond of 
> Rondinal and HC-110.  They seemed to provide me with qualities in 
> negatives that, while sometimes hard to describe, were superior to 
> those of D-76, etc.
>
> I had a similar predilection for Amidol for prints.  A PITA to work 
> with (especially very long times in the tray), but results that were 
> not achievable with Dektol and its clones.  (When I did use Dektol, it 
> was 1:3, not the standard 1:2.)
>
> Earl
>
> *********** REPLY SEPARATOR  ***********
>
> On 8/3/2004 at 7:20 AM Chris Barker wrote:
>
>> Thanks for that Earl.  I might give HC-110 a go once I have finished 
>> my
>> Rodinal.  Mr Mironchuk's writing style is more polemic than didactic
>> and there is a contradiction: why go for a dilute developer for longer
>> wet time when he is trying to reduce wet time?  His views on agitation
>> are interesting; I always try to use the manufacturer's recommendation
>> and the time I agitated less I had rather streaky results ...
>>
>> Chris
>>
>> On 3 Aug 2004, at 3:33, Earl Dunbar wrote:
<|_:-)_|>

C M I Barker
Cambridgeshire, Great Britain.

+44 (0)7092 251126
ftog at threeshoes.co.uk
http://www.threeshoes.co.uk
http://homepage.mac.com/zuiko
... a nascent photo library.

==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz