Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: 180/2 for macro?!

Subject: [OM] Re: 180/2 for macro?!
From: Andrew L Wendelborn <andrew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 08:56:33 +0930
At 7:58 PM -0300 2004.07.27, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile wrote:
>I'm watching at this very moment the first test I run on Provia 100F,
>comparing the 200/4 and the 85~250 @ 200mm, coupled to the 65~116 @ 65mm,
>stopped down both at f11, using a t-32. Picture is of a box of colored glass
>little balls children play with (don't know how they're named in English).

Marbles.

>No differences nor even on color rendition, when projected on a silver
>plated screen using a Kodak Carousel at a quite respectable size. No
>vignetting of course.
>Nxt test will be w/tube at 116mm - when I get an OM2 body again.
>

That will be interesting.

As you're getting good results, I'll revisit my previous experiments with
the 200/5. It's a convenient size and weight, would be good to be able to
use it for macro.


thanks
  Andrew


==============================================
List usage info:     http://www.zuikoholic.com
List nannies:        olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx
==============================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz