| Subject: | [OM] Re: scanning print negatives and scanner exposure inconsistencies |
|---|---|
| From: | "Alienspecimen" <alienspecimen@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 28 May 2004 08:05:02 -0400 (EDT) |
So...Istn't the dynamic range to digital as the exposure latitude to film? In this case, I dont understand why the slide has greater "dynamic range".BorisThis hath not offended the king.Sir Thomas More (at his execution) _______________________________________________ Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com The most personalized portal on the Web! ============================================== List usage info: http://www.zuikoholic.com List nannies: olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx ============================================== |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [OM] : ( O M ) Use of long telephoto lenses for landscape photographs, Alienspecimen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [OM] Re: Which slide film?, Dean Tyler |
| Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: scanning print negatives and scanner exposure inconsistencies, jking |
| Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: scanning print negatives and scanner exposure inconsistencies, Piers Hemy |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |