Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

[OM] Re: Oly IS; was: Why E1 over others?

Subject: [OM] Re: Oly IS; was: Why E1 over others?
From: Paul Laughlin <pelaughlin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 07:33:53 -0800
At 08:26 AM 3/30/2004 -0500, you wrote:

>re: AG's comments about IS:
>The only digital camera I own is an Oly 2100 UZ that I bought specifically
>for the extra long zoom and image stabilization. I think it and the 
>short-lived
>RS 100 (?) were the only IS cameras that Oly produced. I'll have to 
>testify to
>the effectiveness of the IS even at long focal lengths (the 2100 goes to
>380mm in 35mm-equivalent terms). If only it had higher resolution (it's 2 
>MP).
>Anyone know the story behind why Olympus didn't continue with IS technology,
>since they had it at one time?
>Greg

For one thing, Olympus did not own the IS technology used in those 
cameras.  Canon did.  Probably a money factor there or something.
Paul in Portland OR



The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe

To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmin@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus 
List Problem"
        

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz