| Subject: | [OM] Re: Tele-Converters. |
|---|---|
| From: | Andrew Gullen <andrew.gullen@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 20 Feb 2004 07:31:07 -0500 |
Certainly true. I bought a cheapie, and was disappointed until I found a use for it. I paired it with a 50/1.4 and took some shots of my daughter. Voila! Instant 100mm soft-focus portrait lens. The effect was very nice. Andrew > From: "James N. McBride" <jnmcbr@xxxxxxx> > Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 09:08:07 -0700 > > ... Many of the teleconverters are of very poor quality. /jim The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmins@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus List Problem" |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: one more for the bokeh pile, Chuck Norcutt |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [OM] Re: examples of latest work, Richard Lovison |
| Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: Tele-Converters., Chris Barker |
| Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: [lens] Re: Tele-Converters., Tom Trottier |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |