| Subject: | [OM] Re: one more for the bokeh pile |
|---|---|
| From: | Chuck Norcutt <chucknorcutt@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 20 Feb 2004 07:21:10 -0500 |
Works for me too. But which one do you all find the most aesthetically pleasing? I like 2.8. Chuck Norcutt Graham Battison wrote: >>A very unscientific view of the 55/1.2: >> >>http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2145661 > --------------------------- > > Unscientific? Maybe but I spent a lot more time looking at the effect on the > background bokeh than I have ever done with the more usual DOF > illustrations. A refreshing change from the more usual chess board example. > Thanks for posting. The olympus mailinglist olympus@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: mailto:olympus-request@xxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe To contact the list admins: mailto:olympusadmins@xxxxxxxxxx?subject="Olympus List Problem" |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [OM] Re: Flash photography, Chuck Norcutt |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [OM] Re: Tele-Converters., Andrew Gullen |
| Previous by Thread: | [OM] Re: one more for the bokeh pile, Graham Battison |
| Next by Thread: | [OM] Re: one more for the bokeh pile, Moose |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |