Gordon,
If it is genuinely pristine, that's a pretty unmissable price on one of
those! I'd buy it and try it out. If you really don't like it you should be
able to shift it on at a profit.
It is a better lens than the 3.6, however......
Julian
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gordon J. Ross" <gordross@xxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, January 02, 2004 3:17 AM
Subject: Re: [OM] Welcome Gordon
> Hi Lama:
>
> When I'm not being Gord I'm trying to be Buddha! Just to clear up the
story
> and to make sure that anyone on the list who is lusting for a 35-80/2.8, I
> did not buy it, I don't rerally like zooms (as someone pointed out earlier
> we have legs). I mentioned it because it is pristine, like new. The dealer
> is asking a lot of CDN $995. that's about $700 USD high end but it is as
> good as you can get. If everyone keeps ooohhhing about it I might have to
> buy it out of lens-envy!!
>
> Thanks Gord
>
>
>
> > You fit RIGHT in, Gordon. Yeah, it's a reduction if you look at it this
> way: you sold 4 lenses and bought "only" one. The 35-80
> > doesn't "count" because it was attached to a body. :) That's some nice
> glass for sure.
> >
> > All the best,
> > Lama
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|