Cool.
*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
On 12/7/2003 at 7:39 PM Mike wrote:
>>
>>
>>Another issue is archival print quality. With wet darkroom methods and=
>> materials, one can produce prints of archival fairly easily and=
>> inexpensively. My understanding is that the equipment and inks for=
>> archival digital prints is not a throwaway purchase... maybe I am wrong.=
>> I strongly doubt that walking into Costco and coming out with an
>archival=
>> print for $2.99 is possible. Again, someone correct me if I am wrong.=
>> And no, I don't want to start up the digital vs. film storage/archiving=
>> debate!
>>
>>Earl
>>
>Archival quality digital prints are easily produced at home for about a
>dollar +/-. Capital investment is much less than your wet darkroom.
>
>mike
>
>
>< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
>< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
>< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|