Yes, I'm convinced the 2N is the most reliable, and still most serviceable.
----------------------------------------------------
John Hermanson www.zuiko.com
mail: omtech@xxxxxxxxx
Camtech, Olympus Sales & Service since 1977
21 South Lane, Huntington NY 11743-4714
631-424-2121 Turnaround 4-5 weeks
----------------------------------------------------
----- Original Message -----
From: "GeoW" <gwsears@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 7:27 AM
Subject: Re: [OM] 2n vs 2sp?
> Hi Daniel,
> I've been snake bit with the OM2sp and can't even find a good one to
> begin with. Those that I do find have bad IC problems and are not
> repairable. That being said, I have never , knock on wood, had a OM2n
> that could not be rejuvinated by a CLA.
> GeoW
>
>
> > Hey guys.
> > I've reconsidered my OM stuff!
> >
> > Now the only thing I'm unsure of is which body to keep.
> >
> > I had a nice long chat with a camera repair guy (who has a "serviced
> > 28/2.8 zuiko for AUD$100 bucks. A steal?) who tells me I should keep the
> > 2n. I've been using the 2SP for the spotmeter, however I'm not sure if
> > the spotmetering is really that useful. I've been having trouble
> > metering the 2n in low light - I can't see the needle at all. Does
> > anyone have a trick around this (Other than just flipping to auto)?
> > Regardless, which body do you think I should keep?
> >
> > Regards
> > Daniel Tan
> >
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|