Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Olympus E-1 review

Subject: Re: [OM] Olympus E-1 review
From: "Earl Dunbar" <edunbar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 23:02:59 -0400
Interesting.  Of course, the fact that the "punched up" setting is the default 
says something about the target market, I guess.

*********** REPLY SEPARATOR  ***********

On 10/19/2003 at 10:58 PM Moose wrote:

>Earl Dunbar wrote:
>
>>Over on DPReview, which has been fighting over E-1 vs 10D vs 300D
>(digital rebel) ad nauseum,  someone posted a 300D shot and a link to
>more.  I didn't say anything, but I thought they were not good wrt colour
>saturation, sharpnening, etc.  Looked very over-sharpened, over saturated
>to me.
>>
>If you read the first page their review, you will see that the 300D
>default is indeed 'punched up' relative to the 10D, but it is a simple
>menu choice to go to the 10D default settings.
>
>Moose
>
>
>
>< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
>< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
>< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >





< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz