Someone posted a incredible message about IR photography a couple months
back. Most sensors aren't especially sensitive to IR. The poster worked
with IR imaging and had very interesting examples of pulling handprints
off telephone books etc. ... search archives for telephone?
Think of the anti-aliasing filters as blurring the image.
-jeff
----- Original Message -----
From: "Moose" <olymoose@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Just for the record, these are not filters in the sense that you mean.
> Nobody is trying to take away your spectrum. I have no idea how well
or
> poorly digital sensors respond to IR or UV, but, whatever the effects
of
> these filters on the transmission of IR or UV, they are secondary to
the
> primary purpose of limiting light that oscillates between light and
dark
>
> Moose
>
> Boris Grigorov wrote:
>
> ><snip> Something struck me when someone mentioned somepin about the
low pass filter. The camera has processing and I want complete control
over that processing power. Why do I need this low pass filter only?
To me photography is painting with light. I want to experiment and do
not want no steenkin infrared film&see where I am going?. Let me
control the filtering, I would like to experiment (not only in the
infrared spectrum&). I really doubt that this feature would be that
expensive, or as expensive as at least dozen more that I could think of
&
> >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|