Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] (OT) Kodak film formats

Subject: Re: [OM] (OT) Kodak film formats
From: "Roger D. Key" <rdk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 09:58:38 +0200
Note that the Graflex quarter-plate camera had four possible backs/films,
including:

.  Graflex Film Pack Adapter that took a daylight-loading film pack with 12
exposures (9cm x 12 cm = 3 1/4" x 4 1/4") (last made in early 1990's)
.  Graflex Roll Holder holding a special six-exposure roll film (obsolete?)

I expect that the negs came from one of the above.

http://www.graflex.org/articles/series-d/

Roger Key



Andrew wrote:

The key point here is the frame numbers. It was customary to cut roll
film into single frames and pop them in a little glassite bag with
the prints, at this time, especially with negs this size where the
standard print would be a contact print.
It's a big roll though - I'd guess Kodak 122 - as used in the old
Autographic folders or something of similar size. Not what a pro
would use though - are they professional shots?
AndrewF




>Jamie,
>Sounds like 9x12cm, the european counterpart of 4x5in.
>Regards, Moisés
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Jamie Costello [mailto:jcostel1168@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>Sent: Lunes, 08 de Septiembre de 2003 03:08 p.m.
>To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: [OM] (OT) Kodak film formats
>
>
>I just was given a set of B&W negatives (my parents' 1954 wedding) that
are
>in a format I don't readily recognize.  The actual image is approx. 3"x4"
>and the negatie size is approx. 3 1/4 x 4 3/8.  Each is marked "Kodak
Safety
>Film" and has a frame number.  There are no sprocket holes and no film
type
>designation.
>
>Any ideas as to film type and format?   Thanks.
>
>Jamie
>Fort Myers, FL







< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz