Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [OM] Minolta Dimage Scan 5400

Subject: RE: [OM] Minolta Dimage Scan 5400
From: "Dick Lague" <rlague@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2003 13:13:40 -0700
I use Vuescan and love it.  have you used it?

Dick

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Chris Barker
Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2003 6:27 AM
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [OM] Minolta Dimage Scan 5400



I could not give you a scientific answer f_p, but it seems no faster or 
slower than the Canoscan FS4000 that I sold to buy the Minolta.  
However, where the Canoscan used to fanny around before getting on with 
the business of scanning, the Minolta seems somehow more purposeful.  
You can see the slide moving back and forth to focus prior to starting 
the scan.  The first film I scanned was this ISO200 Fuji Superia:

http://homepage.mac.com/zuiko/Dinner2003/

I had to do very little adjustment to the colour or light  before 
saving the scans.  These were scanned at 2700dpi with ICE & ROC in 8 
bit colour.  For me this is a tribute to either the scanner or the 
software.  Also, saving the scan takes much less time with Firewire on 
the Minolta, than with USB1.1 on the Canoscan.

The Minolta has more controls on the front (ON/OFF, Scan, Eject and 
Focus) so you can control without depending on the software to make its 
mind up.  The Canoscan had only an ON/OFF switch, so if the computer 
had gone to sleep and would not wake up (a SCSI card problem on my 
computer), you had to do a switch the power off then on to get the 
slide to eject and stop roasting the negatives.

I was really dissatisfied with Canon's attitude to Mac OSX, as they had 
no driver for it.  However, no sooner had I agreed a sale with a 
perfectly charming German lady working in the UK than the gits came up 
with a new driver (they had denied that they would ever produce one).  
Now I am waiting for Ed Hamrick to do one for Vuescan - I like a little 
choice you see...

I hope that this is helpful

Chris

On Saturday, Jul 26, 2003, at 03:18 Europe/London, Fast Primes wrote:

> Hi Chris,
>
>    How does the 5400 compare with your previous film scanner? And are 
> the scan times you're getting, similar to what others are reporting?
>
> Thanks!
>
> fast_primes
<|_:-)_|>

C M I Barker
Cambridgeshire, Great Britain.

+44 (0)7092 251126
ftog at threeshoes.co.uk
http://www.threeshoes.co.uk
http://homepage.mac.com/zuiko
... a nascent photo library.


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >




< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz