I keep my 4T and 3 in my bag as my usual pair to roam about with. The 4T is
the more versatile of the two, but there's something about that buttery
smooth shutter on the 3...
Plus, I've got a working camera even if I was too shortsighted to bring
spare 357s with me.
I' suggest the 4T. You can probably find a fine body for less than you'd
wind up spending on a 3. They're far more readily available. I believe KEH
has a 'user' 4T champagne right now for just a little over $300USD. Their
bargain is most eyebuyer's 'minty'....
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Johnie Stafford
>Subject: Re: [OM] OM-3 or 4T?
>
>
>>>> On Mon, 23 Jun 2003 06:33:20 -0700, Douglas Tourtelot
>>>> <tourtelot1@xxxxxxxxx> said:
>
> dt> Here's a "which would you rather own" question. I am
>considering dt> a foray into the "high-priced spread" of the
>OM world. Here's dt> what I have and which I like best:
>OM-2SP (least), OM-1 (love it) dt> and two OM-2n (my
>favorites). Don't see a lot of 3s and, God, dt> they are
>expensive. Would a 4T suit someone just as well? Your dt> thoughts.
>
>I've only got a -2n and a -4T, so I don't have a pure manual
>to compare to, but I do love that -4T, its been my favorite
>since I got it in '90.
>
>Johnie
>
>
>< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
>< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
>< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|