Okay, that explains the overexposure. I still can't imagine how I missed it
as I checked them carefully. Even when I took them to Appleby's for
processing, I sorted the film in 2 piles on their counter, all the ones that
were (supposedly) 100iso, and the one film which was 400iso, which I have
here correctly exposed. Guess there must have been 2 that were 400iso. Must
be my age.
Wayne
----- Original Message -----
From: Piers Hemy <piers@xxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2003 6:58 AM
Subject: RE: [OM] forgot another problem
> Edge code EL means Elitechrome 400, see
> http://www.kodak.com/global/en/consumer/products/techInfo/e149/index.shtml
>
> Full marks Moose!
>
> Piers
>
> -----Original Message-----
> Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2003 08:30:34 -0300
> From: "Wayne Culberson" <waynecul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [OM] forgot another problem
>
> > Simple logic applied to the evidence provided suggests that this was a
> > shorter roll of a different, faster, film.
>
> --snip
>
> > Moose
>
> --snip
>
> The last unmounted bit of film has an "X KODAK EL -2" (without
the
> quotation marks) along one side
> of the film. On the other side of the film it has an X and a bit further
> along an XA with a small arrow under the XA.
>
> --snip
>
> Wayne
>
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|