The 16mm lens has pretty nice aesthetics too. That gently curving front
element nearly the diameter of the lens has a graceful beauty to it ...
YMMV but the 24mm shift gets much more use. Given how useful I find the
shift lenses, I'm surprised everyone doesn't have a 35mm shift.
-jeff
----- Original Message -----
From: "Svein Skjøtskift" <svein@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 3:23 PM
Subject: Re: SV: [OM] Re: favorite lenses I don't have
> Lars, I haven't seen the 16mm in person, but it looks very nice. But I
have
> seen, and felt, the 24mm shift, though. Once you have lifted off that
> closely fitted metal cap and seen this beauty in its yellowish eye,
you're
> sold. It's not just a lense, it's a sculpture! (nice for photography,
too -
> I have heard)
> Svein
>
> On Tue, 3 Jun 2003 00:07:20 +0200, Lars Bundesen
<lars.bundesen@xxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> > The 16 mm is the lens I want the most.
> >
> > I have the 8 mm fisheye, but prefer the 16 mm.
> >
> > I have a Sigma 16 mm lens I use with a *an*n body, but that lens
isn't
> > too
> > sharp.
> >
> > Well, a 24 mm shift and the 250/2 would be nice, too.
> >
> > Lars
> >
> >
> > < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Using M2, Opera's revolutionary e-mail client:
http://www.opera.com/m2/
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|