Both are good performers, but the 2.8 will be brighter. The 3.5 is very cheap
though, as it was one of THE standard lenses sold with OM-1/2 kits, along with
the 135/3.5 or 75-150/4..
Look here for quantatitve stuff:
http://members.aol.com/olympusom/lenstests/default.htm
Skip
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Please reply to [skipwilliams at pobox.com]
Direct responses to the email address on the header may get lost
----------------------------------------------------------------->
>Subject: [OM] zuiko 28mm
> From: md4303@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Date: 9 Apr 2003 17:05:00 -0000
> To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>Hello,
>I'm new to the list. I got an OM1 with a 50mm 1.8 and I fulfilled a dream of
>my youth!
>The lens is wonderful!
>Now I want to buy a 28mm but I am uncertain about the 3.5 or 2.8.
>I need highest contast and resolution between F5.6-11.
>I know that the 28mm 3.5 is a very good performer but is single-coated lens.
>The 2.8 has less resolution(maybe) but is multi-coated.
>Price difference is almost insignificant. Any advice will be appreciated.
>Thank you in advance.
>
>Roberto
>Roma,Italy
>
>-----------------------------------------------------
>Invia un sms gratis!
>http://freesms.supereva.it/index.php
>
>messaggio inviato con Freemail by www.superEva.it
>-----------------------------------------------------
>
>
>< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
>< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
>< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|