At 08:22 AM 4/9/2003 +1000, Wayne Harridge wrote:
...
Then again, if it looks like crap at 4"x6" then it'll never look any
better at 8"x10" !
...
That is so... profound! :-)
Actually, I am looking at a 8x10 right now that is almost, but not quite
the opposite - that is, a print may look good on 4x6, but look really good
on a 8x10. Here is an indoor picture, slow shutter speed, large aperture
(I'm almost certain this is the 40/2, forgot the aperture/shutter) etc. so
the face is a bit blurry, but the eyes are tack sharp. This is really
apparent in a larger enlargement like an 8x10, to me it looks better.
http://www.dragonsgate.net/pub/richard/img007.jpg
// richard <http://www.imagecraft.com>
<http://www.dragonsgate.net/mailman/listinfo>
On-line orders, support, and listservers available on web site.
[ For technical support on ImageCraft products, please include all previous
replies in your msgs. ]
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|
