I'm not sure what this is supposed to tell me. What looks one way at
enormous magnification may look another when smaller. Certainly this
whole business of looking at downsized and jpeged images makes some
evaluations pretty difficult. Maybe a jpeg2 would help?
However, I love the close-up as an abstract image on its own merits,
esp. the top half.
Moose
Richard F. Man wrote:
Not so fast. I am still incline to think that it's an artifact of some
Photoshop operations, may be downsizing from the original 4000 DPI to
the 800 pixels (across) image. Here's a full size crop of the flower:
http://www.imagecraft.com/richard/img007-enlarge.jpg It's huge > 2.6
megs (hence it is on ImageCraft, rather than dragonsgate), but I think
you will see that the original is really better. There are some color
artifact that comes from the conversion to sRGB space but you can see
the harsh lines are not as bad.
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|
