| Subject: | Re: [OM] om-1 versus om-3 |
|---|---|
| From: | "Walt Wayman" <hiwayman@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 3 Apr 2003 23:27:35 -0500 |
I've got eight OM bodies: three 4s, three 4T(i)s, one 1 and one
3. The only one I use less than the 1 is the 3. Or maybe it's
the other way around. Anyway, my opinion doesn't count for much
since I obviously don't favor either if there's a 4 to be had.
Walt
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] om-1 versus om-3, Moose |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [OM] Vivitar Series1 600mm f8 $250 BIN, Jeffrey Keller |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] om-1 versus om-3, mak |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] om-1 versus om-3*, Charles Sdunek |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |