Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] 135mm/2.8+2xA

Subject: Re: [OM] 135mm/2.8+2xA
From: Andrew Gullen <andrew.gullen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 08:11:25 -0500
Don't tell me that! I heard the 200/5 was a bit of a dog and the 200/4 was
fairly nice, so I just bought a 200/4.

Gary Reese's tests seem to indicate an approximate draw, with perhaps an
edge to the 200/4, though it may not be significant.

Andrew

> Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2003 19:21:26 -0500
> From: lamadoo@xxxxxxxx
> ...
> There's a lot of agreement that the 200/5 is a honey of a lens, and since I
> can't recommend the 200/4 I had, they're probably right.


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz