> Tris Schuler <tristanjohn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> As I stated, I'm for progress in the area, only I feel it's bound to
> lead
> to un-education of the public photographically speaking (already has
> from
> what I can see).
>
You should check the questions asked in some of the fora (?) on photo.net,
I think
the "un-education" process is well down the track already. The people who
post
the questions on photo.net are just the tip of the iceberg, the ones who
actually
thought enough about something to ask a question, as for the rest...
Wayne Harridge
I've done Photo.net. It's a hoot at times but mainly a waste of time. Full
of egos, very little good discussion about anything I've interest in.
In a way, though, it's a good resource (if you're willing to wade through a
tone of dreck to get to what's pertinent).
Tris
P.S. I believe I'm the only person left from the Great Ban a couple years
ago, something I'm rather proud of in a curious way. <g>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|