Nah, he took the cowards way out again. At least he didn't say he hoped I
get killed by a truck like last time.
Me, I gotta get outta this place. There's just too much perturbation here
for me.
G
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of George Sears
> Sent: Sunday, March 16, 2003 7:46 AM
> To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re:[OM] Re: A conspiracy?-another correction
>
>
>
> YaHooo, By God here we go again.....;-)
>
> GeoW
>
>
> 3/16/03 9:39:17 AM, Jan Steinman
> <Jan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >>From: "George M. Anderson"
> <george@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >>You know, Jan, you could have disagreed
> with me without this horseshit
> >>comment:
> >
> >You know, George, you could have tried to
> actually read and understand what I read,
> and addressed individual points of
> difference, instead of leading with a
> knee-jerk comment like "You're wrong,
> 'cause this here website says other
> stuff."
> >
> >But life is too short. After a short
> hiatus while he was faking civility,
> George is back in my kill file. Does
> wonders for the blood pressure to ignore
> abrasive types.
> >
> >>Jan:
> >>"> You guys are all confusing "rate"
> with "frequency.""
> >>
> >>Me:
> >>I don't want to confuse your steel trap
> of a mind, but that's
> >>because THEY ARE THE SAME THING.
> >
> >Gee, I guess you didn't actually read the
> website you so authoritatively cite then,
> did you? So what's wrong, George, you, or
> the website you used to "prove" I'm wrong?
> But don't bother blowing a head gasket
> over that paradox, since I won't be seeing
> your response.
> >
> >--
> >
>
>
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|