Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Technical Pan?

Subject: Re: [OM] Technical Pan?
From: Skip Williams <om@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 12:44:58 -0500
You really have to use Technidol for Tech Pan to get anything usable for 
continuous tone subjects.

Skip

-----------------------------------------------------------------
Please reply to [skipwilliams at pobox.com]
Direct responses to the email address on the header may get lost
----------------------------------------------------------------->
>Subject: Re: [OM] Technical Pan?
>   From: Joshua Putnam <josh@xxxxxxxxx>
>   Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 08:01:58 -0800
>     To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>R. Jackson wrote:
>> In class we've been doing all of our homework on HP-5 up until now. It's 
>> ok, I guess, but no matter what I do the grain seems oppressive. I tried 
>> using half-strength chemistry last time and using a longer developing 
>> time and it may have come out a little less grainy, but not much. 
>> Anyway, as of yesterday we can use whatever B&W film we want as long as 
>> we can process it with D-76 chemistry. 
>
>That would be a problem -- Tech Pan in D-76 comes out about as 
>contrasty as microfilm.
>
>Ilford Pan-F does OK in D-76 in my experience.  Much lower grain 
>as you'd expect from ISO 50 film vs. 400.
>
>Maco's UP25+ is another fine-grained, slow-speed alternative that 
>does OK in D-76.
>
>-- 
>Joshua Putnam, Agent
>Putnam Financial Services
>A FARMERS Insurance and Financial Services Agency
>Voice: 206/992-2296   Fax: 425/793-3623
>
>
>< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
>< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
>< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz