Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [OM] Blurry Digital images, clear OM shots

Subject: RE: [OM] Blurry Digital images, clear OM shots
From: William Clark <wclark@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 09:30:35 -0500
Get a better camera.  Most, if not all, digcams are cheezy pieces of junk.
People buy all the P&S digcams (BTW a dealer here calls them Pigs in Sh*t
cameras because they profit margins are so high on them and quality is so
poor) and they just cannot cut it in comparision to film.  There are very
few good P&S digcam performers that are good.  I had tried many, if not all
of them, a few years ago before getting an Olympus 2100UZ, probably the best
featured consumer digcam ever.  Why Olympus never improved upon it is beyond
me.  I sold it this year to finance a Fuji S2.  You get what you pay
for.....

-Bill 

-----Original Message-----
From: John Hermanson [mailto:omtech@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: January 29, 2003 9:12 AM
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [OM] Blurry Digital images, clear OM shots


So many people think you're supposed to use a digital the same way you use a
camcorder, with the monitor turned on.  A friend of mine HATED his digital
camera (a Fuji) because when he took low light pictures in his house, the
lcd monitor was dark.  Duh, don't USE the monitor, put it on a tripod, use
the rf. Then use the monitor to preview what you got.  An lcd monitor can't
show a time exposure in real time.
_________________________________
John Hermanson  www.zuiko.com
Camtech, Olympus Sales & Service since 1977
21 South Lane, Huntington NY 11743-4714
631-424-2121 For Free Olympus manuals,
please call 1-800-221-3000
_________________________________
----- Original Message -----
From: "Albert" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 1:43 AM
Subject: [OM] Blurry Digital images, clear OM shots


> My gf just showed me pics taken at her office from her co-worker's
> camera.  It was a C*non S45.  1000f all images were blurry.
>
> First, the office was dark.  Did she switch it to ISO400?  Nope.  Shot
> at ISO100.  Second, the flash is the size of a tic-tac.  Did she care?
> No.  Third, did she shoot the shot pressing the camera to her face?
> nope, she used the LCD screen to frame, shooting away from her body,
> arms out.  All shots, 100% blurry.  So now nobody in her office wants to
> buy that camera, thinking it takes blurry pics.
>
> They comment on how I much have a "much better camera" (well actually, I
> do!  hehehe I love my Om1n) and now it must be vastly superior because
> all MY pics come out crisp and clear...
>
> #1)  The photographer!
> #2)  Tripod!
> #3)  Lens!
>
> I think to me, in that order; of importance...  With sometimes #2 and #3
> flip flopping...
>
> It's NOT the camera only; it's the photographer!!  A good camera will
> not make a lousy photographer into a good one!  My gf now knows..
>
> Albert
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>



< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz