Scanning slide and negative is no comparison, slide is ten times
better for sure! Provided you have a good film scanner with
D-range>3.6 and low noise. Scanning slide get accurate color
reproduction, negative never, different negative gives different color
response curve, you can never get the exact color/tone, what you can
do is to adjust for what it looks "good" can't say accurate. So far
all negative are grainy when scanned except the discontinued Ektar 25,
slides has much less grain.
The only advantage of negative is the wide latitude, when you under or
over exposed a frame you can still get back the details during
scanning.
C.H.Ling
William Clark wrote:
>
> I get better results with slides, which makes the difference for me. If I
> am going to spend time doing this stuff, then I want the best result
> possible with minimal troubles. You are right though, it is just as ardous,
> but my experience is better with slides (quicker)
>
> -Bill
>
________________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan
service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working
around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com
________________________________________________________________________
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|