Hmm. It might be your Tokina..
I had a picture at the zoo of my gf, one was shot with my Zuiko
50mm,f1.8 and the other with the Tokina 90mm/f2.5, and basically the
exact same shot, same place, and similar composition, Same roll of film,
same place, same lighting, everything was as close to the same as
possible. The Tokina was MUCH sharper, so sharp I could see the pores
on my gf's face (she doesn't appreciate her zits being filmed like that)
but it was that sharp. It was so much more noticably sharper that I had
no problems picking out which ones were shot with the 50mm and which was
shot with the Tokina.
But again, most tell me the 28mm/f2.8 is a serious performer, and I've
found mine to be only so so, and still wouldn't mind selling it for a
Tokina 28mm, but from the advice on this board, and the cost of the
Tokina 28mm (NIB), I'd probably just buy it and keep the Zuiko still.
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|