ML Archiv: Re: [OM] OT cars, was 50mm f2 vs 3.5

Subject:	Re: [OM] OT cars, was 50mm f2 vs 3.5
From:	siddiq <iddibhai@xxxxxxx>
Date:	Mon, 18 Nov 2002 10:55:09 -0800

11/18/2002 3:41:10 AM, "Tom Scales" <tscales@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>Infiniti is Nissan's Lexus.  I believe (but am not positive) that the
>Infiniti G35 is the newest Nissan Skyline.
>

yup, the new R35 skyline to be is on the same FM platform.

/S
--
"We apologise for the inconvenience." 




< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
RE: [OM] 50mm f2 vs 3.5, (continued) RE: [OM] 50mm f2 vs 3.5, James N. McBride Re: [OM] 50mm f2 vs 3.5, Tom Scales [OM] OT cars, was 50mm f2 vs 3.5, Chris Barker Re: [OM] OT cars, was 50mm f2 vs 3.5, siddiq Re: [OM] OT cars, was 50mm f2 vs 3.5, Tom Scales Re: [OM] OT cars, was 50mm f2 vs 3.5, Julian Davies RE: [OM] OT cars, was 50mm f2 vs 3.5 - now also 90 f2, IanG Re: [OM] OT cars, was 50mm f2 vs 3.5, Winsor Crosby Re: [OM] OT cars, was 50mm f2 vs 3.5, Chris Barker Re: [OM] OT cars, was 50mm f2 vs 3.5, Winsor Crosby Re: [OM] OT cars, was 50mm f2 vs 3.5, siddiq <= Re: [OM] OT cars, was 50mm f2 vs 3.5, siddiq Re: [OM] OT cars, was 50mm f2 vs 3.5, Jamie Costello Re: [OM] OT cars, was 50mm f2 vs 3.5, Winsor Crosby Re: [OM] OT cars, was 50mm f2 vs 3.5, Jamie Costello Re: [OM] OT cars, was 50mm f2 vs 3.5, Chris Barker Re: [OM] OT cars, was 50mm f2 vs 3.5, Jamie Costello Re: [OM] OT cars, was 50mm f2 vs 3.5, Jim Brokaw Re: [OM] OT cars, was 50mm f2 vs 3.5, Jim Couch Re: [OM] OT cars, was 50mm f2 vs 3.5, Chris Barker Re: [OM] 50mm f2 vs 3.5, VS

Previous by Date:	RE: [OM] OT cars, was 50mm f2 vs 3.5, Timpe, Jim
Next by Date:	Re: RE: [OM] OT Cameras as cars, siddiq
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] OT cars, was 50mm f2 vs 3.5, Winsor Crosby
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] OT cars, was 50mm f2 vs 3.5, siddiq
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]